books on the table
Journal Prompts,  Mindful Moments

The Value of Challenging Books in Education

What books do you want to read?

When I was growing up, I read some of the greatest books ever written. You know the ones, the books that were required reading, but somehow that requirement turned into love, admiration, appreciation, and a deeper way of thinking about the world. Yes, they were challenging, but in the best way possible.

I spent all four years of high school in honors English classes.  We read The Catcher in the Rye. Shakespeare — including Lady Macbeth and her unraveling.  To Kill a MockingbirdThe GiverAnimal Farm.  The list goes on. These stories weren’t just assignments.  They were invitations to think critically, to sit with discomfort, to understand history, power, morality, and humanity in ways that lectures never could.

I remember reading these books together as a class.  We didn’t rush through them.  We took our time, broke them down chapter by chapter, dissecting themes, symbolism, motives and meaning. There were debates and disagreements, but we learned how to think—not what to think.

Those books taught me depth. They taught me nuance. They taught me that the world isn’t simple, and neither are people. Which is why it’s unsettling to see so many of those same books now being removed from schools.

What’s Happening Now

Across the U.S., school districts are banning or restricting books at an unprecedented rate. These decisions are often driven by school boards, administrators, or state-level legislation, usually following challenges from parents or organized advocacy groups.

The most common reasons given?

  • Sexual content or references
  • LGBTQ+ identities or themes
  • Discussions of race, racism, or historical injustice
  • “Inappropriate” language
  • Political or social critique
  • Violence or emotional intensity

On the surface, these bans are often framed as efforts to “protect children.” But many of the books being removed are not new, fringe, or explicit works — they are longstanding classics and award-winning literature that have been taught for decades.

Books like:

  • The Catcher in the Rye
  • To Kill a Mockingbird
  • The Bluest Eye
  • Animal Farm
  • The Handmaid’s Tale
  • The Giver

These aren’t books meant to shock for shock’s sake.  They’re meant to challenge.  And that seems to be the point of contention.

Why These Books Are Targeted

Books are powerful because they ask questions instead of offering neat answers.

They talk about:

  • Systems of power
  • Moral ambiguity
  • Identity and belonging
  • The darker parts of history
  • The consequences of silence and conformity

Many bans happen not because a book lacks value, but because it requires guidance, discussion, and context.  And instead of teaching students how to engage with difficult material, the response is often to remove the material entirely.

That’s the part that feels most heartbreaking. We weren’t just handed these books and left alone with them. We were taught how to read them thoughtfully. There were discussions, questions, and we learned how to hold complexity without fear.

What We Lose When We Remove Them

When books are banned, students don’t just lose stories — they lose the chance to practice critical thinking in a safe, guided environment.

They lose:

  • The ability to confront uncomfortable truths with support
  • Exposure to perspectives different from their own
  • The language to talk about hard things
  • The understanding that complexity doesn’t equal danger

Those honors English classes didn’t make me cynical or corrupted. They made me curious. Empathetic. Aware. They taught me how to think deeply and responsibly, skills I still use today.

A Quiet Grief

There’s a quiet grief in realizing that the books that helped shape who I am might never reach another student in the same way. That the stories that once opened doors are now being closed off out of fear. Not fear of harm — but fear of thought. And that’s what worries me most. Because books don’t tell us what to believe. They teach us how to ask better questions. And that’s something worth protecting.

Well-Known Books Being Challenged or Banned

These are books many of us read in middle school or high school — now frequently restricted or removed in school districts across the U.S.

• To Kill a Mockingbird – Harper Lee
Banned or restricted for discussions of race, racism, and use of racial slurs, despite its central themes of justice and empathy.

• The Catcher in the Rye – J.D. Salinger
Challenged for language, mental health themes, and “immorality.” Often criticized for portraying teenage alienation honestly.

• The Giver – Lois Lowry
Banned for themes of euthanasia, control, and challenging authority — the very points the book asks readers to question.

• Animal Farm – George Orwell
Removed for political allegory and critique of power, despite its long-standing role in teaching about authoritarianism.

• The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood
Frequently banned for sexual content and political themes, even though it’s widely taught as a warning about extremism and loss of rights.

• The Bluest Eye – Toni Morrison
One of the most challenged books in America, often banned for confronting racism, trauma, and abuse — topics many argue require discussion, not silence.

• 1984 – George Orwell
Restricted for political ideology and depictions of violence, despite its relevance to discussions about surveillance and truth.

• Of Mice and Men – John Steinbeck
Challenged for language and themes of disability, poverty, and violence.

• Brave New World – Aldous Huxley
Banned for sexual references and criticism of conformity and consumerism.

• Fahrenheit 451 – Ray Bradbury
Ironically banned for themes about censorship and suppression of ideas.

youtube placeholder image

Buy here: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/b/banned-books/_/N-rtm

What did the books you read growing up teach you about the world — and who might you be if you’d never been allowed to read them at all?

“A society afraid of books is a society afraid of thought.”-Unknown

woman reading a book while lying on a hammock

WANT MORE?

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE THE LATEST STORIES, TIPS & INSIGHTS, PLUS SOME EXCLUSIVE GOODIES!

I don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


Discover more from Embrace The Unseen

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 Comments

  • Tony Burgess

    I hate the censorship and removal of books because it most likely hurt someone’s feelings or something like that. They seem to want no one to be challenged or to think for themselves.

  • Jackie

    One thing I found about 19th century children’s books that was missing in contemporary literature from my childhood is it seemed like the 1800s was a golden period of relatively accessible literature that is not too hard to read that really addressed the complexity of the world. I finally felt seen when I read “Anne of Green Gables” which happens to be a Canadian public school system staple for generations because it had enough without too much grittiness to feel like the disenfranchised can finally be seen.

    I think the 20th century in children’s books moved away too much from the raw realness of 19th century children’s books but there are so many 21st century books for kids that accomplish making unique kids or disadvantaged kids feel seen. These new books sometimes also balance concerns about age appropriateness with intellectual gritty topics in a more thoughtful way. It’s a shame that in a new golden age for children’s literature there is all this censorship.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Embrace The Unseen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by MonsterInsights